Joel Spolsky has nailed it right on the head in his commentary about why the record industry wants to charge more for some songs over others. I wish I would've written it. The logic of it is inescapable, if you ask me. (You did, didn't you?)

This is it in a nutshell (from the article):

"Now, the reason the music recording industry wants different prices has nothing to do with making a premium on the best songs. What they really want is a system they can manipulate to send signals about what songs are worth, and thus what songs you should buy. I assure you that when really bad songs come out, as long as they're new and the recording industry wants to promote those songs, they'll charge the full $2.49 or whatever it is to send a fake signal that the songs are better than they really are. It's the same reason we've had to put up with crappy radio for the last few decades: the music industry promotes what they want to promote, whether it's good or bad, and the main reason they want to promote something is because that's a bargaining chip they can use in their negotiations with artists."

And, BINGO was his name-oh!

There you go... and here I was all this time thinking it was just about the money. It's about control. Dig it.

Click here to read the article at JoelOnSoftware.com.

Write Comment (0 Comments)

A fascinating article at the BBC tells the story of Bill Bundock. He was diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease and his wife watched him ride the slow spiral of withdrawal that plagues people with this ailment.

But, that all changed when they started to attend a local singing group aimed at helping people with dementia. He didn't initially join in... after a while, though, he began to sing along. His wife says he became more like his old self.

Clive Ballard, director of research at the Alzheimer's Society and Professor of Age Related Diseases at King's College, London, said singing and rhythm, even listening to a metronome, has been shown to help people with Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease. He says that the brain speech center is different from the area of the brain that processes music. This enables people who loose their speech to still be able to enjoy listening to music.

Click here to read the article at BBC News website.

Write Comment (0 Comments)

Ok, so which is it? I surf over to Digg.com and find an article that claims CD sales are being hurt by Orwellian DRM technology. People are mad when they buy a CD and it won't play on their computer. So, I'll buy that...

On the other hand, I check out CNet's music news and discover that Sony is not being hurt at all by the whole "rootkit saga"...

It all just stinks to me. Sounds like a media conspiracy of Art Bellian proportions.

Write Comment (0 Comments)

It would seem that simply applying a piece of tape to the outside edge of any DRM enabled CD completely defeats the system. You can then pop the disk into a PC and skip right to the music.

DRM doesn't work... and never will. The only option the labels have is apparently to lobby congress to pass laws forcing PC manufacturers to include built-in DRM technology. That way, you can be charged whenever you try to rip a song off a CD you purchased.

It is like I said in an earlier comment... the record and movie industries will not be happy until they can charge you every single time you listen to a song or watch a movie. With a pro-rated fee based on "partial" plays.

Greed... I wonder if we can get that classified as a disease. Then the Feds could subsidize the behavior like they do everything else.

Click here to read the article at Vunet.com.

Related: The RIAA says that installing root kits is "no biggie." Clueless, they are, truly clueless. Click here to read about it.

And, last but not least, the big old state of Texas has sued Song BMG music claiming that their rootkit illegally installed spyware on people's computers. Click here to read about it at KWTX.com. Gotta love that!

Write Comment (0 Comments)